
Used properly, it provides VERY good recording quality, and if youre a good musician thats wonderful.I’ve been wanting to rip my old cassette tapes of original songs for a long time, so I picked up a Roland Tri-Capture because I knew it was designed with that kind of activity in mind.The new head of its class is the multifaceted TRI-CAPTURE USB interface a unique, compact audio interface optimized for personal and mobile recording, vocal and guitar recording, and streaming-internet applications. Its well-suited for singer-songwriter work, home demos, and multilayer DAW ('digital audio workstation') recording - and you wont have to take out a second mortgage to afford it. Rolands Tri Capture is a really good device.
However, try installing the tri-capture driver ver. It has an XLR-only jack for a mic, a TRS-only jack for guitar or line, and a pair of unbalanced RCA aux inputs, as well as stereo TRS outputs and a 1/4" headphone jack.With the new studio-capture, roland once again raises the performance standard for computer-based audio production. Balanced 1/4 TRS outputs and headphone jack Low-latency ASIO driver.Guitar Input: -25 dBuIt’s a compact, odd-looking little device- it actually looks like a miniature Atari 400 computer with a photo-negative color scheme. I have 2 x Roland Fantom XR and 1 x Roland Sonicell sound modules that are used with a DAW through USB MIDI interface.Roland UA-33 TRI-CAPTURE USB Audio Interface w/ 3 Recording Modes & Cakewalk. Good Day I have requested assistance under Insider Forum but seeing that it is now closed, I am stating the issue here.
Low-latency ASIO driver recording and playback at rates up to 24-bit/96.It offers three input modes: “Mic/Guitar,” where only the first two inputs are recorded, “All inputs,” where all inputs are recorded in a 2-channel stereo mix, and “Loop back” which records all inputs like “All inputs” mode, but also routes your computer’s system audio into the interface so you can, for example, sing along to the soundtrack from a game or a YouTube video. The affordable Tri-Capture interface ignores all the squares and straight lines. The setup package generally installs. This channel provides information of the roland's best quality electronic musical instruments.
Roland Tri Capture Full Duplex 44
The sample rate controls are little switches on the bottom of the device all other controls are buttons or pots on the top of the unit. I’m not sure whether there’s a way to adjust this at the Windows control panel level you might have to just hope your source application offers a way to manage the signal volume.The interface supports full duplex 44.1 and 48kHz operation and half duplex 96kHz (you can either play or record in 96k you can’t do both). The Tri-Capture does not appear to offer a way to adjust the level of incoming PC audio in Loop Back mode, unfortunately. Once I made the Tri-Capture my default playback device, I was able to record everything (mic, guitar, aux, and PC audio) all at once.Each of the three input channels (Mic, Guitar, and Aux) have their own input gain controls if you only need to record on your aux inputs, for example, you can just turn down the other two channels all the way. DAWs and other apps that are ASIO or DirectSound aware aren’t affected. When you do this, Windows routes the audio of any application that doesn’t offer audio device selection to the device of your choice.
Note that the performance gaps between the interfaces are way beyond any effect of the buffer size deltas. I list the sample buffer sizes after the interface name. Note that in every case I had to pick “as close to 256 samples as possible” because all of these interfaces have jacked-up control panels that either don’t let you specify “powers of two” buffer sizes, or don’t accurately pass your selected buffer size to the driver (my screenshots will show what I mean). I normally record at 44.1kHz/24-bit with a 256 sample buffer (that’s my “set-it-and-forget-it” configuration), and I compared the combined input and output latencies reported by Ableton Live on my laptop to those of three other interfaces I’ve got sitting around: The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2, Zoom R8, and the Roland Duo-Capture EX.Below are the results, from best to worst. Like most interfaces in its price range, the Tri-Capture is fully USB bus powered (so no battery operation or iPad compatibility)In terms of audio latency, the Tri-Capture performs surprisingly well.

Using samples instead would help users mentally separate the buffer concept from actual ASIO latency:Janky R8 control panel. The buffer slider is sorta confusing in its use of “ms” as a configuration metric. Yes those are “O”s used to represent the performance/stability ratio:Janky 2i2 control panel. Also, I don’t think it’s possible to adjust the incoming PC volume at the interface in Loop Back mode.At only $100 USD this thing’s a pretty good value for someone with a mic/guitar setup, or people who simply need cheap, reliable AD/DA.Due to the very specific input configuration, folks with external stereo synths or grooveboxes might be able to use the aux inputs with the right cables and adapters, since many synths tend to have unbalanced outputs anyway, but the Tri-Capture’s more aimed at singers, guitarists, and home audio users.Tri-Capture and other interfaces mentioned in this post:Janky Tri-Capture control panel. Also, the “peak” indicators on the device are more like “kinda loud” indicators they go red well before your input signal risks being clipped, which makes adjusting an optimal input level a little more of a pain than it needs to be.
